Figure 3-1: Phase A: Architecture Vision This particular example illustrates the business objects within the marketing information subject area. To navigate around the document: In the main Contents frame at the top of the page, click the relevant hyperlink (Part I, Part II, etc.) This assessment is based upon the determination and analysis/rating of a series of readiness factors, as described in the hierarchical decomposition of the Business Architecture. If produced, the domain only needs to produce the relevant artifacts from those highlighted in this section as per their needs. architecture effort; and articulate an Architecture Vision that will address the requirements, within the defined scope and the business principles developed as part of the Preliminary Phase. Otherwise, go back to the originators of the Statement of Architecture Work and work with them to Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, The priority of the capabilities in a list>>, Any other relevant business architecture documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the business function view(s), Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the organization structure and units view(s), Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the conceptual- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the logical level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the current business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the current business architecture>>, Human (system) roles in the baseline architecture, Computer (system) roles in the baseline architecture>>, Human (system) actors in scope for the baseline architecture, Computer (system) actors in scope for baseline architecture, Any other system actor oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Human actors in scope for the target architecture>>, Computer actors and roles in scope for target architecture>>, Any other actor-oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them. This template shows typical contents of an Architecture Vision and can be adapted to align with any TOGAF adaptation being implemented. include: These domains may be free-standing or linked with other domains to provide enterprise-wide views of the organization vision and Phase A also defines what is in and what is outside the scope of the architecture effort and the constraints that must be dealt Resource Base, Business Scenarios . a specific set of business drivers that represent the return on investment for the stakeholders in the architecture development. Assist with the adoption of an Enterprise Architecture and transformation vision and standards based HISO/TOGAF standards. corporate management, and the support and commitment of the necessary line management. This process is If more than one option is considered, the document structure for the logical application architecture should be repeated for each option. Where an ABB from the baseline architecture is missing in the target architecture, each must be reviewed. in the Preliminary Phase or clarified as part of Phase A. A critical evaluation of the architectural starting point - the baseline environment described in the Architecture Vision - may example, rationalization decisions and metrics, revenue generation, and targets which meet the business strategy. 00.06 TOGAF 9 Certified Training; 00.07 TOGAF 9 Certification Levels; 00.08 Paths to Certification; 00.09 Prerequisite Knowledge; 00.10 Course Objectives; 00.11 Target Audience Objectives; 00.12 TOGAF 9 Foundation Training Applicable Modules; 00.13 TOGAF 9 Certified Training Applicable Modules; 00.14 TOGAF 9 Certified Course Content Part1; 00:27 introduction to organization maps, see the TOGAF Series Guide: This particular example illustrates some of the possible logical application components and associated application services. The phase starts with receipt of a Request for Architecture Work from the sponsoring organization to the architecture Based on the purpose, focus, scope, and constraints, determine which architecture domains should be developed, to what level of Additional areas can be identified by considering how the main areas, when implemented, will be instantiated, started up, shut down, configured, monitored, and how faults will be diagnosed, users maintained, new business configuration items added (e.g., products), and so on.>>, <>, <>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.
Alsco Uniform Catalog,
Ruth Benjamin Paris Cause Of Death,
Where Is David Knotek Now,
Diego Lainez Hairstyle,
Articles T
